Sunday, July 11, 2010

Same old rant... same old response...

Hammer Tim, thank you for the Lib/Ndp mantra. Your rant was so long, I have to split into parts to respond:

Why the Neo-Con-Reformers
**What a tired label borrowed from the USA and its politic. Anyone else notice the irony?**

will never get a majority; because they’re the party of...

- budgetary incompetence, the party that goes from surplus to deficit.

**this statement relies on collective amnesia. All opposition parties demanded stimulus spending despite any deficit it might accrue; then so to hypocritically turn around and complain about it doesn't fool anyone. To use this tired old argument says these parties think Canadians are too stupid to remember.**

The party that goes from denying a deficit is imminent, to running the biggest deficit in Canadian history!

**It is true the deficit was record high. But the US deficit was 100 times larger. And when you consider the deficit compared to gdp, ours was the lowest in the western world.
Then question is, was it the appropriate response to such a crisis?**

- the party with the threat of having 10 MPs disqualified from holding office because of the in and out scandal... including Ministers Baird, Prentice and others...

**Yawn, every MP is under threat like this. The question is, how does the government respond to wrong doing? Guergis is a prime example... your outta there baby.
Compare that to other parties covering up their scandalous MPs... Seriously folks, we aren't talking about MP's stealing diamond rings on camera here (A certain other party comes to mind) ooo they hate it when I say that.***

- the party of the bogus infrastructure cheques, with CPC LOGOS, MP's signatures... that got their hands slapped for...

***Again another yawner. I can remember similar cheques with a great big red L on them. If I were the Conservatives, I wouldn't have stopped doing it. But they did...dang it.***

No comments:

Post a Comment