1967?  That is the year Canada died--having been hijacked by socialists whose failed vision was financial disaster for the country, after failed "visionary" disaster after another.
Ok we get that Janice is in bed with Jack, but must we put up with the ridiculous?  We have been 5 years into a series of minority governments.  To have "vision" in that setting is to lose a confidence motion.  Get real.  Without a majority, at best incremental progress is the survival tactic.

2% reduction in GST instead of elimination.  Upgrade of the military made possible because Canadians were embarrassed by their condition after "visionary" neglect.  Nothing vision-less about lack of corruption:  Compared to visionary government of the past, a breath of fresh air.  An economy that is not in tatters: Now there is a thought.  How boring.  If we were as "visionary" as the classical, sterling example of the president to our south, our deficit for the past 2 years would be 300 billion dollars.  But in true visionary style, as all mirages do, substance vanishes away.

If that is vision, you can keep it.


_____________________

@Stepnlll, I agree that Quebecers are known for voting strategically. However, they also are known for letting their emotions get in their way. Remember, the CPC failed to win many seats in Quebec mostly because, in the last weeks of the campaign, Mr. Harper made the disastrous arts funding cut back. Seats that may have gone CPC for strategic reasons, flipped to BQ instead.

How much will change when they realize the CPC has a majority? It will be hard for the strategic voter to resist. For all its separatist instincts, it sure hates being on the outside of power looking in