Look LENR needs credible spokes people. Everytime a proponant goes off on a tangent, it undermines credibility relative to that person's knowledge of LENR. I have been a person open to LENR since before Rossi's release last January. I have agrued against LENR's *opponents in the forums, because I believe it ought to have a chance to live up to its promise. So that is why I get upset, when people barge into places as though they have knowledge when they actually don't, because if they are wrong on this point, they appear more likely to be wrong on the other (lenr). There is a credibility gap. Please don't go making it deeper.

Who said anything about immune? I will say again, and its too bad one of my posts was deleted in this thread, you can't compare a Candu reactor built on the Canadian Shield, to Fukashima built next to a major fault line, perched on the ring of fire. Do some reading on Candu's low temperature reactors (Fuk and Chern, were both high temperature.) before you dive in over your head. But one of the key aspects of a Candu reactor is that it can burn nuclear waste from almost every other nuclear reactor in the world. Want to reduce nuclear waste on a global scale?

Nuclear accident fallout does not respect country borders. If an explosion at a nuclear facility happens (like Fukoshima) then the radioactivity can traverse the entire Northern or Southern hemisphere. You have just shown your ignorance of how dangerous a supposedly "safe" nuclear installation can be. Nuclear accidents are not just confined to weather phenomena.
3 hours ago · Like
Free Energy Truth
Nuclear installations don't need to be on fault lines for things to go badly wrong, take Chernobyl for example. They thought that everything was nice and safe as well, that is, until the plant melted down leaving the surrounding town and area an uninhabitable wasteland.

And can I also point out that Canada is not immune to random acts of terrorism either. Trying to push your "safe" nuclear agenda on this group is pissing into the wind